What Is a Good Resting Heart Rate for Your Age? A Complete Guide

If you've ever checked your smartwatch or a pulse app and wondered whether your number is "good," you're not alone. It's one of the most common health questions people search for, and the honest answer is that it depends on more than your age.

Most adults fall somewhere between 60 and 100 beats per minute (bpm) at rest. But within that range, and sometimes well below it, your resting heart rate reflects your fitness level, your nervous system, your sleep, and even what you had for breakfast. This guide breaks down what the research actually says.

What Counts as a Normal Resting Heart Rate

Resting heart rate changes dramatically across childhood before settling into an adult range. According to a large U.S. national reference study from the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics, average resting pulse rate is around 129 bpm under age 1, drops to about 96 bpm by age 5, and falls further to roughly 78 bpm in early adolescence. By adulthood, the average plateaus around 72 bpm (Fleming et al., 2011).

Interestingly, that plateau doesn't happen at the same time for everyone. The same CDC data found that male resting pulse rate tends to plateau in early adulthood, while female resting pulse rate plateaus later, in middle age.

For most healthy adults, the clinically accepted normal range is 60 to 100 bpm (American Heart Association).

Why Resting Heart Rate Isn't Just About Age

Age explains the big picture, but it doesn't explain why two 40-year-olds can have resting heart rates 20 or 30 beats apart. A large analysis from the Fenland Study, involving thousands of adults, found that resting heart rate functions as a population-level biomarker of cardiorespiratory fitness, not simply a marker of age (Fenland Study researchers, 2023). In other words, your training history often tells you more about your resting heart rate than your birth certificate does. For a deeper look at how aging itself affects both resting and maximum heart rate, see our related post, Why Your Heart Rate Lowers as You Age.

What Actually Lowers Resting Heart Rate: Training Adaptations

This is where the mechanism gets interesting. A resting heart rate below 60 bpm, known as sinus bradycardia, is common in people who train consistently, and it's usually a sign of an efficient cardiovascular system, not a problem.

For years, the leading theory was that this was mostly driven by increased parasympathetic ("rest and digest") tone. More recent research points somewhere else: a 2014 study published in Nature Communications found that exercise training lowers resting heart rate through downregulation of the HCN4 "funny channel," a change in the heart's own pacemaker cells rather than just nervous system signalling (D'Souza et al., 2014). A related study found that training-induced bradycardia is largely explained by a reduced intrinsic heart rate, the heart's built-in resting rate independent of nerve signals (Lewis et al., 2016).

In plain terms: consistent aerobic training doesn't just calm your nervous system, it physically remodels how your heart's pacemaker cells behave.

Real-World Examples: How Low Can Resting Heart Rate Go?

Elite endurance athletes regularly measure resting heart rates in the 30s and low 40s bpm, a well-documented adaptation driven by increased stroke volume and vagal tone (Bradycardia in Athletes, Circulation, 2025). This isn't rare in that population, it's closer to the norm.

A few examples that come up often in sports media: five-time Tour de France winner Miguel Indurain has frequently been cited around 28 bpm, and Michael Phelps has been reported in the low-to-mid 30s during peak training. These are commonly repeated figures rather than individually verified clinical measurements, but they illustrate just how far this adaptation can go at the extreme end of endurance sport.

I've seen this firsthand. During my eight years competing in boxing, training six to eight times a week, my resting heart rate sat around 43 beats per minute, a direct result of years of consistent aerobic conditioning. Today, my resting heart rate is noticeably higher, sitting around 65 bpm. Aerobic training is something I've let slide in my own programming lately, and that number is proof of how quickly the adaptation fades without it. It's a good reminder, even for those of us who coach this for a living, that resting heart rate reflects what you're actually doing, not what you used to do.

When a Lower Number Isn't Automatically Better

It's worth being honest about the limits here. While training-induced bradycardia is usually benign, a 2025 review in Circulation notes it can, in rare cases, resemble a pathological condition affecting the heart's natural pacemaker (sinus node disease). Numbers alone don't tell the full story, symptoms matter. A low resting heart rate accompanied by dizziness, fainting, or unusual fatigue is worth discussing with a doctor. A low number with no symptoms, in someone who trains consistently, is usually just efficiency.

What Can Temporarily Raise Your Resting Heart Rate

Resting heart rate isn't fixed day to day. Common, usually temporary factors that can raise it include:

• Caffeine, which blocks adenosine receptors that normally promote relaxation, increasing alertness and heart rate

• Dehydration, which makes the heart work harder to maintain circulation

• Stress, through adrenaline and cortisol

• Poor sleep or sleep disruption

• Certain medications, including some decongestants, asthma medications, and thyroid medications

• Illness, particularly fever or infection

This is a big part of why tracking a single reading matters less than tracking your trend over time, ideally first thing in the morning, under similar conditions.

Resting Heart Rate and Long-Term Health Risk

This is the section worth taking seriously without overreacting to it. A meta-analysis published in CMAJ, pooling 46 studies and over 1.2 million people, found that each 10 bpm increase in resting heart rate was associated with a 9% higher relative risk of all-cause mortality (Zhang et al., 2016). Separately, the Kailuan cohort study, following over 47,000 adults, found that people with a persistently elevated resting heart rate across repeated measurements over several years had close to double the mortality risk of those with consistently lower readings (Wang et al., 2017).

To be clear, this is an association across large populations, not a prediction about any one individual. A single elevated reading doesn't mean much on its own. A consistent pattern over time, especially alongside other risk factors, is what the research is actually describing.

How to Apply This in Training

• Track your resting heart rate consistently, ideally first thing in the morning, before caffeine, to establish your own baseline rather than comparing yourself to a generic chart.

• Build your aerobic base through consistent, moderate-intensity training. See our Zone 2 Cardio Program for a structured approach to this.

• Watch for trends, not single readings. A sudden increase of 5 to 10 bpm above your normal baseline can be an early signal of fatigue, illness, or inadequate recovery.

• If your resting heart rate is consistently above 100 bpm at rest, or you notice a sudden unexplained change alongside symptoms like dizziness or fatigue, that's worth a conversation with your doctor.

Key Takeaways

• A normal adult resting heart rate falls between 60 and 100 bpm, with the population average settling around 72 bpm.

• Resting heart rate reflects fitness and training history at least as much as it reflects age.

• Consistent aerobic training can lower resting heart rate through real physiological changes in the heart's pacemaker cells, not just relaxation.

• Elite endurance athletes commonly measure in the 30s and low 40s bpm, an extreme but well-documented version of the same adaptation.

• A persistently elevated resting heart rate over time is associated with higher long-term health risk in large population studies, though a single reading says very little on its own.

Medical Disclaimer

This article is intended for general educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Resting heart rate can be affected by many individual factors, including medications and underlying health conditions. Anyone with concerns about their heart rate, or symptoms such as dizziness, fainting, chest discomfort, or unexplained fatigue, should consult a physician or qualified healthcare provider.

References

Fleming, S., et al. (2011). Resting pulse rate reference data for children, adolescents, and adults. National Health Statistics Reports, 41. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr041.pdf

Quer, G., et al. (2020). Inter- and intraindividual variability in daily resting heart rate and its associations with age, sex, sleep, BMI, and time of year. PLOS ONE. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7001906/

Fenland Study. (2023). Resting heart rate is a population-level biomarker of cardiorespiratory fitness. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174582/

D'Souza, A., et al. (2014). Exercise training reduces resting heart rate via downregulation of the funny channel HCN4. Nature Communications. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms4775

Lewis, N. C. S., et al. (2016). Exercise training bradycardia is largely explained by reduced intrinsic heart rate. International Journal of Cardiology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27497097/

Bradycardia in athletes: Prevalence, mechanisms, and risks. (2025). Circulation. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.076170

Zhang, D., et al. (2016). Resting heart rate and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the general population: A meta-analysis. CMAJ. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/3/E53

Wang, A., et al. (2017). Cumulative resting heart rate exposure and risk of all-cause mortality: Results from the Kailuan cohort study. Scientific Reports. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep40212

Target heart rates chart. American Heart Association. https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/exercise-and-physical-activity/fitness-basics/target-heart-rates

How Tongue Position and Jaw Function May Improve Strength, Balance, and Breathing

Part 1 of the Improving Force Production and Movement From Head to Toe Series

Written by Michael Crawley, BSc, BPT, CSCS

Introduction

When people think about improving strength and force production, attention is usually directed toward the obvious areas: the legs, hips, trunk, and shoulders. Rarely does anyone consider the tongue or jaw.

At first glance, this seems reasonable. The tongue is typically associated with speech, swallowing, and airway function rather than athletic performance. However, emerging research suggests that tongue position, tongue strength, and jaw function may influence force production, balance, coordination, and respiratory mechanics.

Force is rarely generated by a single muscle or body part in isolation. Instead, it is transferred throughout the body as multiple regions work together. A foundational piece of this is learning how to position the body to generate and transmit tension effectively. As covered in The Stack blog post, the alignment of the rib cage relative to the pelvis and head provides a structural template that underpins efficient force production. The strategies explored in this series build on that foundation.

This article is the first in a series examining how different regions of the body contribute to force production and movement quality. We will begin at the top, exploring the tongue and jaw, before working downward through the diaphragm and foot.

Series Breakdown

This series will explore three often-overlooked contributors to force production, movement quality, and long-term function:

1. The tongue and jaw

2. The diaphragm and bracing

3. The foot and pressure distribution

Together, these concepts provide additional tools that may help an individual break through a plateau in a lift, improve their strategies to strength train, or attenuate some of the deficits and systemic problems which develop with age. Each of these builds on the positional foundation established in The Stack.

The Tongue & Jaw: Pressure and Position

The embryological development and anatomy of the tongue can shed light on how it is a forgotten piece in strength training and human function beyond mastication and speech. The tongue consists of intrinsic and extrinsic muscle connections. This allows an intricate dance where the complex can adapt its activation and position differently during breathing and swallowing (Fregosi and Ludlow 2014).

The tongue has the same neural origins as the hyoid bone and associated musculature involved in head and neck stabilization. The hyoid bone is a floating bone acting as an interface for the origin of the tongue and connector of important neck and jaw muscles.

There is a functional relationship between the tongue and diaphragm, demonstrated through the coordinated activation of specific extrinsic tongue muscles during respiration (Sokoloff 2004). As a result, tongue function can influence how easily air moves through the airway and how efficiently we breathe. This will really be hammered home in Part 2 regarding the diaphragm and bracing.

The tongue and jaw do not operate independently. Resting tongue position helps influence both jaw alignment and head posture, with the ideal resting position being the tongue gently placed against the roof of the mouth.

The jaw is also closely connected to the neck and upper body through muscles, nerves, and connective tissues (Silveira et al. 2015). Because of these connections, changes in jaw position can influence how the head, neck, and shoulders work together.

This is important because force is rarely generated by a single muscle or body part. Instead, it is transferred throughout the body as multiple regions work together. The tongue and jaw may seem far removed from exercises such as squats, deadlifts, or carries, but their connections to the neck and upper body suggest they can still influence posture, stability, and force production.

The image below highlights some of the tissues that link the jaw, neck, and shoulder region. Next, we will discuss how tongue function changes over time and why this may be particularly important for the older athlete.

Importance of Tongue Function in the Older Athlete

When most people think about age-related muscle loss, they think of weaker legs, reduced grip strength, or difficulty getting up from a chair. What is often overlooked is that the tongue also loses strength and muscle mass with age.

This decline in tongue function has been associated with several important health concerns, including impaired swallowing, increased risk of aspiration, and poorer balance (Bordoni et al. 2018). In other words, tongue function may influence much more than speech or eating.

For older athletes and gym-goers, this creates an interesting opportunity. Maintaining tongue strength and awareness may be a simple strategy to support both performance and long-term health. While it is unlikely to be the most important piece of the puzzle, it may be one of the easier ones to address. Similar to strength training itself, small improvements maintained over time can have a meaningful impact on long-term health, balance, and independence.

This could be as simple as applying firm tongue pressure to the roof of the mouth during heavier lifts or practicing proper resting tongue position while performing breathing exercises and warm-up activities.

Evidence of Tongue Pressure and Strength Performance

At this point, it is reasonable to ask whether tongue position and tongue pressure actually influence strength and movement, or whether this is simply an interesting anatomical discussion.

While the research in this area is still developing, several studies have demonstrated improvements in force production, balance, and movement performance when tongue position or tongue stimulation is altered.

Some examples include:

• Saito et al. (2022) demonstrated that the rate of force development (RFD) of tongue pressure was strongly correlated with knee extensor strength and single-leg stand time in adults over 65.

• di Vico et al. (2013) found that tongue position significantly impacted knee flexor strength test performance. Participants generated approximately 30% greater force when the tongue was pressed against the roof of the mouth compared to a resting position.

• Wildenberg et al. (2010) found improvements in balance and postural sway following external tongue stimulation in older adults.

Taken together, these findings suggest that tongue function may influence more than just speech, swallowing, and breathing. It may also play a role in force production, balance, and coordination.

This does not mean tongue position should become the primary focus of a training program. Rather, it may represent another small but useful strategy that can be incorporated alongside sound strength training principles.

The diagram below demonstrates the recommended tongue position, with the tongue resting against the roof of the mouth and the tip sitting just behind the upper front teeth. The next question is why these changes might influence performance in the first place.

Why Might the Tongue and Jaw Influence Performance?

At this point, the obvious question is: why would tongue position or jaw activity affect strength, balance, and movement quality in the first place?

The honest answer is that we do not know exactly. While the relationship between tongue position and breathing is well established, the mechanisms behind its apparent influence on force production and coordination are still being investigated.

Several theories have been proposed, including changes in nervous system activation, interactions between cranial nerves involved in coordination, and connective tissue links between the tongue, neck, and chest (Bordoni et al. 2018). Regardless of the exact mechanism, multiple studies have demonstrated improvements in strength, balance, and movement performance when tongue position, tongue pressure, or jaw activity are altered.

Similar findings have been reported with jaw clenching. Research has demonstrated improvements in force production, grip strength, jumping performance, rowing strength, and balance when a jaw clench is incorporated during testing (Allen et al. 2017; Buscà et al. 2016; Alghadir et al. 2015).

However, there is an important trade-off. Unlike tongue position, excessive or habitual jaw clenching can contribute to issues such as teeth grinding (bruxism) and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) irritation. For that reason, I generally place greater emphasis on tongue position and tongue strength than aggressive jaw clenching. The potential benefits appear similar, while the downside risk is lower.

The broader lesson is that force production is not simply a function of the muscles directly involved in a lift. The body operates as an integrated system, and seemingly small factors such as tongue position, breathing strategy, and jaw position may influence how force is generated and transferred throughout the body.

This is one reason why movement assessments should look beyond individual muscles and joints. At Avos Strength, our assessment process examines how multiple systems work together to influence movement quality, performance, and long-term function.

Summary

The tongue and jaw may influence more than speech, swallowing, and chewing. Research suggests they can also affect breathing, balance, coordination, and force production.

While these factors are unlikely to be the primary drivers of performance, they represent simple strategies that may improve movement quality and strength expression when combined with sound training principles.

For older adults, maintaining tongue function may also have benefits beyond the gym, supporting balance, respiratory function, and overall quality of life.

Takeaways

• Pressing the tongue firmly against the roof of the mouth may help improve force production during strength exercises.

• Resting the tongue gently against the roof of the mouth can support an open airway and efficient breathing during mobility, warm-up, and recovery work.

• Jaw clenching may improve strength, jumping performance, and balance, but excessive or habitual clenching can contribute to jaw irritation and teeth grinding.

• If choosing between the two strategies, tongue position is likely the lower-risk and more practical place to start.

• These concepts should be viewed as small pieces of the puzzle, not replacements for sound strength training, recovery, and exercise technique.

Next Up

In Part 2, we will move one step lower and examine the diaphragm, breathing, and bracing.

Topics will include:

• Basic diaphragm anatomy and function

• The relationship between breathing and trunk stability

• Bracing strategies for strength training performance

• Practical applications for both performance and long-term health

If you'd like a movement assessment to see how these systems are working together in your own body, book an initial assessment.

References

Alghadir, A. H. et al. 2015. Effect of three different jaw positions on postural stability during standing. Funct Neurol 30(1), pp. 53-57.

Allen, C. et al. 2017. The Effects Of Jaw Clenching And Jaw Alignment Mouthpiece Use On Force Production During Vertical Jump And Isometric Clean Pull. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 32, p. 1. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002172

Bordoni, B. et al. 2018. The Anatomical Relationships of the Tongue with the Body System. Cureus 10. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3695

Buscà, B. et al. 2016. Effects of Jaw Clenching While Wearing a Customized Bite-Aligning Mouthpiece on Strength in Healthy Young Men. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 30(4).

di Vico, R. et al. 2013. The acute effect of the tongue position in the mouth on knee isokinetic test performance: a highly surprising pilot study. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 3(4), pp. 318-323.

Fregosi, R. F. and Ludlow, C. L. 2014. Activation of upper airway muscles during breathing and swallowing. J Appl Physiol 116(3), pp. 291-301. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00670.2013

Miró, A. et al. 2023. Acute effects of jaw clenching while wearing a customized bite-aligning mouthguard on muscle activity and force production during maximal upper body isometric strength. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness 21(1), pp. 157-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2022.12.004

Saito, S. et al. 2022. Relationship between Rate of Force Development of Tongue Pressure and Physical Performance. J Clin Med 11(9). doi: 10.3390/jcm11092347

Silveira, A. et al. 2015. Jaw dysfunction is associated with neck disability and muscle tenderness in subjects with and without chronic temporomandibular disorders. Biomed Res Int 2015, p. 512792. doi: 10.1155/2015/512792

Sokoloff, A. J. 2004. Activity of tongue muscles during respiration: it takes a village? Journal of Applied Physiology 96(2), pp. 438-439. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01079.2003

Wildenberg, J. C. et al. 2010. Sustained cortical and subcortical neuromodulation induced by electrical tongue stimulation. Brain Imaging Behav 4(3-4), pp. 199-211. doi: 10.1007/s11682-010-9099-7

Is Two Days per Week of Strength Training Enough for Longevity?

Written by Evelyn Calado, MKin, CSCS, RKin

If you look at most public health guidelines, the answer seems straightforward. Adults are advised to perform muscle-strengthening activities at least two days per week. This recommendation appears in Canadian, American, and international guidelines and applies to both adults and older adults.

But this raises an important question.

Is two days per week simply the minimum needed to check a health box, or is it actually enough to support long-term health, independence, and longevity?

The short answer is that two days per week can be enough, but only under specific conditions. Frequency alone does not determine whether strength training meaningfully impacts longevity. The quality and intensity of the stimulus matter far more than the number of days on a calendar.

What the Guidelines Actually Mean

Public health recommendations are designed for populations, not individuals. Their goal is to identify the lowest effective dose of activity that meaningfully reduces disease risk at a broad scale.

When guidelines recommend strength training twice per week, they are not suggesting that this is optimal for strength, muscle mass, or performance. They are identifying a threshold below which health risks increase, particularly as we age.

In other words, two days per week is a floor, not a ceiling.

Strength Training and Longevity: What the Research Actually Shows

Research consistently shows that resistance training is associated with lower all-cause mortality, reduced cardiovascular disease risk, and improved long-term health outcomes. From a public health perspective, even relatively small amounts of strength training appear to provide meaningful benefit.

However, it is important to be precise about what these findings actually represent.

Most large-scale longevity studies are designed to identify the minimum effective dose of strength training required to reduce population-level risk. They are not designed to define what is optimal for building strength, preserving muscle mass, or maximizing physical capacity across the lifespan.

In this context, it is true that one to two well-performed strength training sessions per week capture a substantial portion of the longevity benefit observed in epidemiological research. Beyond that point, additional sessions do not appear to reduce mortality risk in a simple, linear fashion.

This does not mean that training more is unnecessary, nor does it suggest that strength beyond a certain point stops being valuable. It simply reflects how longevity is measured in large populations.

For individuals interested in aging well, remaining strong, and protecting themselves against injury, disability, and loss of independence, the goal should not be to meet the minimum dose, but to build and maintain as much usable strength as possible over time.

Longevity vs Capacity: Two Different Goals

It is worth separating two concepts that are often conflated.

Training for longevity focuses on reducing disease risk and maintaining basic function. Training for capacity focuses on building strength, muscle mass, power, and resilience.

While two strength sessions per week may be sufficient to support longevity-related outcomes and can improve strength and muscle mass, they are often not the most effective approach for maximizing those qualities long term, particularly in trained individuals or as we age.

From a coaching perspective, the objective is not to do the least amount of work required to stay alive. The objective is to build a body that remains capable, robust, and adaptable for decades.

That typically requires more than the minimum.

Grip Strength, Brain Health, and Why Strength Is More Than Muscle

One of the most compelling demonstrations of strength’s relationship to long-term health comes from research on grip strength.

A large prospective study using data from nearly 500,000 adults in the UK Biobank examined the association between hand grip strength and dementia incidence. Grip strength, often used as a proxy for overall muscular strength, was found to be strongly and inversely associated with dementia risk.

Individuals in the lowest quartile of grip strength had a 72 percent higher incidence of dementia compared to those in the highest quartile.

This finding is important for two reasons.

First, it reinforces that muscular strength is closely tied to neurological and cognitive health, not just physical capability.

Second, it highlights that simple, measurable indicators of strength can reflect deeper systemic health. This is one reason grip strength is included in assessments such as the Avos Performance Battery. It provides insight into overall robustness, not just hand function.

Strength training, when performed with sufficient intensity, appears to play a meaningful role in preserving mobility, independence, and long-term brain health.

Strength Still Matters Even When Cardio Is “Good Enough”

Another frequently overlooked point is that strength contributes to longevity independently of cardiovascular fitness.

A long-term study following approximately 1,500 men over the age of 40 with hypertension for nearly 18 years examined the relationship between muscular strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, and mortality risk.

The findings were striking.

Even among men who were only in the bottom half of cardiorespiratory fitness, those in the top third for muscular strength had an almost 48 percent lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to those in the lowest strength group.

In other words, being strong mattered, even when aerobic fitness was not exceptional.

The lowest mortality risk was observed in individuals who were both strong and aerobically fit, but strength alone still provided a substantial protective effect. This reinforces the idea that resistance training is not optional if longevity is the goal.

Is Two Days per Week Enough in Practice?

This is where nuance matters.

For many adults, particularly those with limited time, two well-designed strength training sessions per week can meaningfully support long-term health. When performed with sufficient intensity and progression, this approach can maintain and often improve key outcomes such as:

• Muscular strength

• Muscle mass (particularly in untrained individuals or those returning to training)

• Bone health

• Joint capacity and tissue tolerance

• Metabolic health

• Overall function and independence as you age

However, outcomes depend on the goal, training history, and how the sessions are structured.

If an individual’s goal includes maximizing lean muscle mass, strength, power, or creating a larger buffer against age-related decline, training more than twice per week is often useful. This is not because two days “doesn’t work,” but because additional sessions often make it easier to accumulate more high-quality weekly training volume, practice key movement patterns, and progress without excessively long sessions.

Frequency alone does not determine effectiveness. What matters is whether training provides enough mechanical tension, effort, and progression to challenge the tissues that decline most rapidly with age.

Using five-pound dumbbells indefinitely, avoiding effort, or treating strength training as light activity rather than progressive overload is unlikely to produce meaningful adaptation.

Two high-quality sessions can outperform several low-effort ones. But for many people seeking to age strong, three to four sessions per week can be a practical way to accumulate more total weekly work and drive continued progress, especially once the “beginner gains” phase has passed.

Aging Changes the Equation

As we age, muscle protein synthesis becomes less responsive, strength declines faster than endurance, and power loss accelerates. This means that intensity and intent become increasingly important over time.

For older adults, two days per week may still be sufficient, but only if:

• Exercises are appropriately loaded

• Movements challenge balance and coordination

• Strength is trained through meaningful ranges of motion

• Progression is maintained where possible

Training “often enough” is not the same as training “effectively.”

At Avos Strength, we build programs around your training history and goals, not just the minimum guidelines. If you want to know whether your current training frequency is actually driving progress, you can book an assessment here.

Strength Training for Longevity: Staying Active, Capable, and Competitive as You Age

Written by Evelyn Calado, MKin, CSCS, RKin

For most people, aging means slowing down, getting injured more often, and gradually stepping away from the sports or activities they once loved.
But it doesn’t have to be that way.

At Avos Strength, one of our core goals is helping people stay active and strong enough to keep doing what they love. Whether that’s playing hockey, hiking, running around with grandkids, or competing in tennis well into their seventies.

Longevity isn't just about living longer. It's about being able to play longer.

Strength Training Is the Foundation

The research is clear: strength training is one of the most powerful tools for healthy aging.

The Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines recommend that adults engage in strength training at least two times per week. Not just walking. Not just stretching. Strength work.

Why?

Because as we age, we naturally lose:
• Muscle mass (sarcopenia)
• Bone density (osteopenia)
• Balance and coordination
• Speed and power

None of that is inevitable if you stay consistent and take action early.

Strength training helps maintain lean mass, reinforce bone density, improve joint integrity, and significantly reduce the risk of falls, fractures, and injuries. It improves your ability to move, lift, rotate, decelerate, and react. These skills matter whether you’re skiing or just stepping down a curb.

Our Clients Are Proof

We work with clients in their sixties, seventies, and beyond who are still playing high-level sports. Hockey. Tennis. Pickleball. Soccer.

They’re not outliers because of genetics. They’re still going because they’ve trained consistently for years. They’ve built capacity and resilience. And now they’re seeing all their peers slow down, drop off, or get injured while they’re still showing up and performing.

That’s not luck. That’s training age, smart coaching, and commitment.

It's Never Too Late to Start

You don’t need to start in your thirties or forties to benefit from strength training.

We’ve seen people start in their sixties and still build muscle, improve balance, regain confidence, and feel better than they have in years.

The science backs this up. You still have the ability to increase strength, coordination, and motor control at any age. What matters is that you start now and do it with support and structure.

The Right Attitude Is Just as Important

Training isn’t just physical. It’s mental. And the attitude you bring into the gym matters just as much as the exercises you do.

We don’t work with clients who say things like:
"I can’t do that."
"I’m too old."
"That’s not for someone like me."

Because the more you say you can’t, the more you won’t.

You still have the ability to wire new movement patterns, build new neural pathways, and develop new skills. Research shows that your brain and body are capable of adapting well into later life. You just have to give them the opportunity.

We will always coach you safely and program with purpose. But you need to be willing to try.

The clients who see long-term success are the ones who stay curious, open, and engaged. They say yes more than they say no. That mindset carries them forward.

This Is a Lifestyle, Not a 3-Month Fix

At Avos Strength, we don’t believe in quick fixes or short-term programs. This isn’t a three-month transformation. This is long-term development.

Strength training is not just about lifting weights. It’s about:
• Building confidence in your body
• Staying resilient against injury
• Learning skills that stay with you
• Creating structure in your week
• Building meaningful relationships with coaches and teammates who support you

Our clients train with us because they want to live well and play hard for as long as possible. And they enjoy the process along the way.

The Bottom Line

Strength training is one of the best investments you can make for your future self.

Whether you're trying to stay in the game, reduce your injury risk, or simply move better and feel stronger, it’s never too late to start. What matters is that you stay consistent, train with intention, and surround yourself with people who care about your long-term success.

Train. Play. Repeat.

If you're ready to build a strong, capable version of yourself, we’re here for that.
Book a session with Avos Strength and let’s get started.

How Many Steps Should You Walk a Day?

Walking is often recommended as a simple yet effective form of exercise. But how many steps should you aim for each day? Whether you're counting steps or tracking minutes, the answer varies based on your fitness level and goals. Let’s break down the benefits of walking and why this common movement is important for everyone, regardless of conditioning level.

The Benefits of Walking

Walking is one of the most natural movements for humans. Our bodies are designed to walk, and in today’s increasingly sedentary world, we need to move more than ever. Walking is often undervalued, but it offers many benefits, including:

• Improved Mental Health: Regular walks, especially outdoors, can reduce stress, anxiety, and symptoms of depression.

• Better Joint Health: Walking helps lubricate the joints, which can reduce stiffness and discomfort, particularly in those with arthritis.

• Increased Caloric Burn: While walking may not burn as many calories as intense exercise, it can still help with weight management.

• Enhanced Cardiovascular Health: For some individuals, walking is an excellent way to improve heart health.

Walking in Nature: A Double Benefit

Walking in nature offers an additional layer of benefits. Research shows that being in green spaces can reduce stress, lower blood pressure, and improve mood. The color green has a calming effect on the nervous system, promoting relaxation and reducing anxiety. Walking among trees, plants, and natural landscapes allows you to reset mentally, giving your brain a break from the overstimulation of daily life. So, if possible, try to walk outside in nature to enjoy these mental and emotional benefits.

Walking: Is It Always Cardio?

For someone who is deconditioned (hasn’t exercised regularly), walking can provide a significant cardiovascular benefit. It can elevate their heart rate into a zone where their body adapts, improving their heart and lung capacity over time. This makes walking an accessible entry point into fitness for many.

However, for those who are more conditioned, a leisurely stroll is unlikely to challenge the cardiovascular system. While walking remains beneficial, it may not elevate the heart rate high enough to prompt the adaptations typically associated with cardiovascular exercise. In these cases, faster-paced walks, hills, or other forms of more intense exercise may be needed for those specific cardio benefits.

Walking Isn’t Just About Cardio

Even if walking doesn’t improve your cardiovascular fitness, it’s still important for overall health. Walking is essential for mobility, circulation, and mental clarity. Regular walking helps combat the harmful effects of sitting, which has been linked to various health risks, including heart disease, diabetes, and even premature death.

Walking helps you stay active throughout the day, which is more important than you might think. Modern lifestyles tend to be highly sedentary, with long periods spent sitting at work, in transit, or at home. Even if walking doesn’t challenge your cardiovascular system, it’s an essential habit for staying healthy.

Don’t Forget to Swing Your Arms!

Another often overlooked aspect of walking is the importance of swinging your arms. In our modern world, where many of us hold our phones or keep our hands in our pockets, the natural arm swing can easily be forgotten. However, swinging your arms as you walk is essential for proper body mechanics. It promotes torso rotation, helping your spine move more naturally, and increases hip extension, allowing for a more efficient gait. This arm movement also helps balance and propel your body forward, making your walk more effective and biomechanically sound.

How Many Steps Should You Aim For?

You've likely heard the recommendation to walk 10,000 steps a day. However, this number is somewhat arbitrary. It originated from a Japanese marketing campaign in the 1960s and has since become a widely accepted target. But it’s not a magic number.

The truth is, your step goal depends on where you’re starting from. If you’re currently not walking much at all, aiming for 10,000 steps right away may feel overwhelming. Instead, start with a smaller, more manageable number. For example, 6,000 steps per day could be a great starting point for some people. Over time, gradually increase your step count as your fitness level improves.

Walking in Terms of Minutes

If you prefer tracking time rather than steps, the Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines recommend that adults get at least 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic activity per week, which can include brisk walking. This breaks down to about 30 minutes of walking five days a week. You can split this into shorter bouts throughout the day to make it more manageable.

However, remember that for walking to count as moderate activity, it needs to raise your heart rate. For someone who’s conditioned, a brisk pace or walking uphill may be necessary to achieve this.

What Does the Science Say?

Recent research supports the idea that you don’t need to hit 10,000 steps daily to reap the health benefits. A 2021 study published in the journal JAMA Network Open found that walking 7,000 steps per day was associated with a lower risk of mortality compared to fewer steps. Other studies suggest that even 4,000-5,000 steps per day can improve health outcomes, especially when combined with more vigorous activity.

The key takeaway from recent literature is that every step counts, and the more you walk, the better. However, pushing yourself to an arbitrary goal like 10,000 steps may not be necessary, especially if you’re starting from a lower baseline.

Start Where You Are

If you’re new to walking or have been inactive, don’t be discouraged if you’re not hitting 10,000 steps. Start with what’s achievable for you. If that’s 2,000 steps a day, that’s great! Gradually increase your steps each week as your fitness improves. You’ll still enjoy significant health benefits even at lower step counts, and consistency is more important than perfection.

The Bottom Line

Walking is one of the most accessible forms of movement available to us, but its impact depends on your fitness level and goals. For some, it’s an excellent cardiovascular workout, while for others, it’s a way to stay active, improve mental clarity, and combat the sedentary lifestyle. Instead of focusing on an arbitrary number of steps, find a level that works for you and build from there. Whether it’s in terms of steps or minutes, walking more is always a step in the right direction—just don’t forget to swing your arms and, if possible, get out in nature!